千岛湖蓝藻密度制约因素分析

图1 千岛湖采样点位图
Figure.1 Sampling points in the Qian-dao Lake
表1 千岛湖一些理化指标与蓝藻密度的线性相关矩阵
Tab. 1 Pearson correlation between Cyanophyceae density and some physical-chemical factors
|
项目 |
|
WT |
PH |
D |
COD |
TN |
TP |
SD |
DO |
CD |
|
Pearson
Correclation |
WT |
1.000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PH |
.833** |
1.000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
D |
.332 |
.268 |
1.000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
COD |
.290 |
.313 |
.029 |
1.000 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
TN |
-.202 |
-.115 |
-.355 |
-.004 |
1.000 |
|
|
|
| |
|
TP |
.150 |
.263 |
.186 |
.074 |
-.023 |
1.000 |
|
|
| |
|
SD |
-.554** |
-.460* |
-.331 |
-.205 |
-.181 |
-.056 |
1.000 |
|
| |
|
DO |
-.424* |
-.007 |
-.153 |
-.124 |
.321 |
.205 |
.049 |
1.000 |
| |
|
CD |
.543** |
.681** |
.542** |
.222 |
-.162 |
.704** |
-.296 |
.035 |
1.000 | |
|
Sig
(2-tailed) |
WT
PH
D
COD
TN
TP
SD
DO
CD |
.000
.105
.135
.303
.446
.002
.025
.003 |
.196
.105
.560
.176
.014
.972
.000 |
.891
.082
.373
.106
.466
.005 |
.984
.707
.296
.530
.257 |
.907
.357
.096
.410 |
.775
.295
.000 |
.804
.127 |
.860 |
|
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level(2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level(2-tailed).
&Cyanophyceae density (×104个/升) in the Thousand-island Lake
|
点位 |
入选变量 |
逐步回归方程 |
复相关系数 |
综合F值 |
综合Sig |
|
街口 |
1 WT |
CD=12.49×WT-176.6 |
0.540 |
10.71 |
0.003 |
|
12航标 |
1 WT |
CD=13.16×WT-184.6 |
0.638 |
15.82 |
0.001 |
|
小金山 |
1 SD
2 D |
CD=-132.78×SD+68.73×D
-6032.6 |
0.645 |
7.49 |
0.003 |
|
排岭水厂 |
1 TP
2 D
3 COD |
CD=25908×TP+56.62×D
+459.2×COD-2333.1 |
0.863 |
19.28 |
<0.001 |
|
航头岛 |
1 WT
2 D |
CD=10.12×WT+33.73×D
-995.3 |
0.625 |
7.390 |
0.003 |
|
积岭口 |
1 WT
2 D |
CD=3.14×WT+3.05×D
-109.7 |
0.630 |
8.21 |
0.001 |
|
茅头尖 |
1 WT
2 COD |
CD=2.69×WT+36.06×COD
-66.7 |
0.621 |
7.21 |
0.004 |
|
三潭岛 |
1 TP
2 D |
CD=5103×TP+5610×D
-972.8 |
0.766 |
18.46 |
<0.001 |
|
密山 |
1 WT
2 D |
CD=1.66×WT+5.03×D
-326.1 |
0.700 |
10.07 |
0.001 |
|
大坝前 |
1 SD |
CD=49.9-5.35×SD |
0.425 |
5.08 |
0.034 |
|
全湖平均 |
1 WT
2 TP
3 D |
CD=9.20×WT+11166×TP
+15.95×D-848.2 |
0.888 |
26.08 |
<0.001 |
